Libya vs Panama: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Libya
0 ha per person
in 1992
Panama
0 ha per person
in 2021
Libya rank
101st
Panama rank
101st
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Libya
- Panama
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 101st and Panama ranks 101st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Libya |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Panama |
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Libya or Panama?
- Libya, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama as of 1992.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Libya and Panama?
- 0 ha per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Libya and Panama rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Libya ranks 101st and Panama ranks 101st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.