Latvia vs Nepal: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Latvia
0.0026 ha per person
in 2024
Nepal
0.0023 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
27th
Nepal rank
30th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0026 ha per person against 0.0023 ha per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Latvia ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 30th of 105 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0026 ha per person | 0.0016 ha per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Latvia or Nepal?
- Latvia, at 0.0026 ha per person against 0.0023 ha per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 30th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.