Jordan vs Libya: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Jordan
0 ha per person
in 2009
Libya
0 ha per person
in 1992
Jordan rank
101st
Libya rank
101st
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Libya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Jordan ranks 101st and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Libya |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Jordan or Libya?
- Jordan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya as of 2009.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Jordan and Libya?
- 0 ha per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.