Gambia vs Lithuania: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Gambia
0.0053 ha per person
in 2015
Lithuania
0.0064 ha per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
16th
Lithuania rank
13th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0064 ha per person against 0.0053 ha per person in Gambia, a difference of 0.0011 ha per person.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Gambia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 16th and Lithuania ranks 13th of 105 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0098 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0069 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.0073 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0043 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.0057 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Gambia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0064 ha per person against 0.0053 ha per person in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Gambia and Lithuania?
- 0.0011 ha per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2015.
- How do Gambia and Lithuania rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 16th and Lithuania ranks 13th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.