Chad vs India: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Chad
0.0025 ha per person
in 2024
India
0.0022 ha per person
in 1990
Chad rank
29th
India rank
32nd
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Chad
- India
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.0025 ha per person against 0.0022 ha per person in India, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times India's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 29th and India ranks 32nd of 105 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0112 ha per person | 0.006 ha per person | 0.0052 ha per person | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.0094 ha per person | 0.0044 ha per person | 0.005 ha per person | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.0059 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.004 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Chad or India?
- Chad, at 0.0025 ha per person against 0.0022 ha per person in India as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Chad and India?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and India?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
- How do Chad and India rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Chad ranks 29th and India ranks 32nd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.