Belgium vs Pakistan: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Belgium
0.0007 ha per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
50th
Pakistan rank
52nd
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Pakistan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0007 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Pakistan ahead.
Belgium ranks 50th and Pakistan ranks 52nd of 105 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Belgium or Pakistan?
- Belgium, at 0.0007 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Belgium and Pakistan?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Pakistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Pakistan rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 50th and Pakistan ranks 52nd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.