Pakistan vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan
0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
95th
Peru rank
93rd

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Peru
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 95th and Peru ranks 93rd of 139 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.1147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.1467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.1502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1331 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.1531 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.0918 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0551 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.0478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Peru?
0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Peru rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Pakistan ranks 95th and Peru ranks 93rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/pakistan/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/pakistan/peru/">Pakistan vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.