Nicaragua vs Romania: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Nicaragua
0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Nicaragua rank
85th
Romania rank
88th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Romania
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 85th and Romania ranks 88th of 139 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0435 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0448 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Nicaragua or Romania?
Nicaragua, at 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Nicaragua and Romania?
0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Nicaragua and Romania rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Nicaragua ranks 85th and Romania ranks 88th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Romania: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/nicaragua/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/nicaragua/romania/">Nicaragua vs Romania: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.