Namibia vs Uruguay: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Namibia
0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
117th
Uruguay rank
116th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Namibia
  • Uruguay
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.010.012196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 117th and Uruguay ranks 116th of 139 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Namibia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Namibia and Uruguay?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Namibia ranks 117th and Uruguay ranks 116th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uruguay: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/namibia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/namibia/uruguay/">Namibia vs Uruguay: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.