Israel vs Mauritius: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Israel
1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
13th
Mauritius rank
16th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Israel
  • Mauritius
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 139 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.1921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0794 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1503 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.3604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.7111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
2010s 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
2020s 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Israel or Mauritius?
Israel, at 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Israel and Mauritius?
0.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Israel ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Mauritius: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/israel/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/israel/mauritius/">Israel vs Mauritius: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.