India vs Rwanda: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

India
1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
14th
Rwanda rank
15th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • India
  • Rwanda
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

India ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0734 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1970s 0.2005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.3449 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.7279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.8662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), India or Rwanda?
India, at 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between India and Rwanda?
0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Rwanda rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
India ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Rwanda: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/india/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/india/rwanda/">India vs Rwanda: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.