Gambia vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia
0.3604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
43rd
Nepal rank
44th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gambia
  • Nepal
0123196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.3604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Gambia ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 44th of 139 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.1389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.1508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7388 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.1757 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.2593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.3377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.3604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9778 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Nepal?
Gambia, at 0.3604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Nepal?
0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Nepal rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gambia ranks 43rd and Nepal ranks 44th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/nepal/">Gambia vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.