Eswatini vs Ghana: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
0.1292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
64th
Ghana rank
65th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Ghana
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 64th and Ghana ranks 65th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Ghana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0757 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 0.0907 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0849 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.1222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2020s 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Ghana?
Eswatini, at 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Ghana?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 64th and Ghana ranks 65th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Ghana: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/ghana/">Eswatini vs Ghana: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.