El Salvador vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

El Salvador
0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
47th
Nepal rank
44th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Nepal
0123196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 44th of 139 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.1439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.1756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.1958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.2233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.2606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9778 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), El Salvador or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.3288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between El Salvador and Nepal?
0.0514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Nepal rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
El Salvador ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 44th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/el-salvador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/el-salvador/nepal/">El Salvador vs Nepal: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.