Congo vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
96th
Peru rank
93rd

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Peru
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Congo ranks 96th and Peru ranks 93rd of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Peru?
0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Peru rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 96th and Peru ranks 93rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/peru/">Congo vs Peru: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.