Congo vs Pakistan: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
96th
Pakistan rank
95th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Pakistan
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 139 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.0195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.0313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1531 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.0364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0918 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Pakistan?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Pakistan rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Pakistan: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/pakistan/">Congo vs Pakistan: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.