Chile vs Zimbabwe: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
120th
Zimbabwe rank
122nd

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 139 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Zimbabwe?
Chile, at 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Zimbabwe?
0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.