Chile vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
120th
Namibia rank
117th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Namibia
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Chile ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 117th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Namibia?
0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 117th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.