Angola vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
115th
Namibia rank
117th

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Namibia
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 117th of 139 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Namibia?
Angola, at 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Namibia?
0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Namibia rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 117th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/namibia/">Angola vs Namibia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.