Latvia vs Saudi Arabia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Saudi Arabia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
104th
Saudi Arabia rank
107th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 104th and Saudi Arabia ranks 107th of 136 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Saudi Arabia?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 104th and Saudi Arabia ranks 107th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.