Kazakhstan vs Malta: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Kazakhstan rank
115th
Malta rank
114th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malta ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 115th and Malta ranks 114th of 136 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Malta?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malta?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malta rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 115th and Malta ranks 114th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.