Czechia vs Libya: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Czechia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Libya
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Czechia rank
103rd
Libya rank
100th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Czechia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Czechia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 100th of 136 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Czechia or Libya?
- Libya, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Czechia and Libya?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Libya?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Libya rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Czechia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 100th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.