Latvia vs Morocco: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Latvia
0.0002 ha per person
in 2017
Morocco
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
91st
Morocco rank
94th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Morocco, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Morocco ahead.
Latvia ranks 91st and Morocco ranks 94th of 137 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Latvia or Morocco?
- Latvia, at 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Morocco as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Latvia and Morocco?
- 0 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 91st and Morocco ranks 94th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.