Czechia vs Zambia: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Czechia
0.0003 ha per person
in 2017
Zambia
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
84th
Zambia rank
86th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Zambia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zambia ahead.
Czechia ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 86th of 137 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Czechia or Zambia?
- Czechia, at 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Czechia and Zambia?
- 0 ha per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Zambia rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 86th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.