Bhutan vs Panama: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
Bhutan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Panama
0 ha per person
in 2014
Bhutan rank
132nd
Panama rank
135th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Panama
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 132nd and Panama ranks 135th of 137 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, Bhutan or Panama?
- Bhutan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between Bhutan and Panama?
- 0 ha per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Panama?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and Panama rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 132nd and Panama ranks 135th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.