Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value

Bangladesh
428 1000 USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2,260 1000 USD
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
9th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th

Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
02.0k4.0k6.0k199120072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2,260 1000 USD against 428 1000 USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 1,832 1000 USD.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.3 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 15 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 76.86 1000 USD 3,707 1000 USD 3,631 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 80 1000 USD 3,273 1000 USD 3,193 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 207.2 1000 USD 4,674 1000 USD 4,466 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 353.8 1000 USD 3,267 1000 USD 2,913 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — gross production value, Bangladesh or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2,260 1000 USD against 428 1000 USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — gross production value between Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1,832 1000 USD, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — gross production value?
Bangladesh ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (current thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fibre-crops-raw-n-e-c-gross-production-value-current-thousand-us/bangladesh/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fibre-crops-raw-n-e-c-gross-production-value-current-thousand-us/bangladesh/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fibre crops, raw, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (current thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
32 places, 1,080 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.