Luxembourg vs Sweden: Other beans, green — Production, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sweden
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
93rd
Sweden rank
92nd
Other beans, green — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sweden ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 97 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other beans, green — production, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other beans, green — production, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for other beans, green — production, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other beans, green — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other beans, green — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.