China vs Malta: Other beans, green — Production, per square kilometre
China
1.99 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
2.41 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
4th
Malta rank
3rd
Other beans, green — Production, per square kilometre over time
- China
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 2.41 t per square kilometre against 1.99 t per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.42 t per square kilometre.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times China's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 3rd of 98 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.96 t per square kilometre | 6.47 t per square kilometre | 4.51 t per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.99 t per square kilometre | 3.3 t per square kilometre | 1.3 t per square kilometre | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other beans, green — production, per square kilometre, China or Malta?
- Malta, at 2.41 t per square kilometre against 1.99 t per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other beans, green — production, per square kilometre between China and Malta?
- 0.42 t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do China and Malta rank globally for other beans, green — production, per square kilometre?
- China ranks 4th and Malta ranks 3rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other beans, green — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other beans, green — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.