Grenada vs Zimbabwe: Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Grenada
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Grenada rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Grenada
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 96 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Grenada or Zimbabwe?
- Grenada, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Zimbabwe rank globally for other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Grenada ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other beans, green — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.