Ecuador vs Rwanda: Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Ecuador
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ecuador rank
17th
Rwanda rank
14th
Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Ecuador, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 96 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other beans, green — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.