Denmark vs Singapore: Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Singapore
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 1992
Denmark rank
93rd
Singapore rank
93rd
Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Singapore
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Singapore, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Denmark ranks 93rd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 96 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
| 1970s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Denmark |
| 1980s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Singapore?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Singapore as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Singapore?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Singapore?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
- How do Denmark and Singapore rank globally for other beans, green — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 93rd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other beans, green — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other beans, green — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.