Kyrgyzstan vs Luxembourg: Other Agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — Import Value
Other Agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — Import Value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 12,647 1000 USD against 12,484 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 163 1000 USD.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 75th and Luxembourg ranks 76th of 157 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Luxembourg?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 12,647 1000 USD against 12,484 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2008.
- What is the difference in other agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg?
- 163 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Luxembourg rank globally for other agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 75th and Luxembourg ranks 76th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other Agricultural tractors (two-axle tractors) — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.