Guatemala vs Malawi: Oranges — Production, per square kilometre
Guatemala
1.02 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.9994 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
31st
Malawi rank
33rd
Oranges — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Guatemala
- Malawi
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.02 t per square kilometre against 0.9994 t per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0206 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 33rd of 120 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.55 t per square kilometre | 0.7856 t per square kilometre | 0.76 t per square kilometre | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 1.13 t per square kilometre | 0.9649 t per square kilometre | 0.1671 t per square kilometre | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges — production, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Malawi?
- Guatemala, at 1.02 t per square kilometre against 0.9994 t per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in oranges — production, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Malawi?
- 0.0206 t per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malawi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Malawi rank globally for oranges — production, per square kilometre?
- Guatemala ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 33rd of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oranges — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.