Iraq vs South Africa: Oranges, Mandarines — Losses
Oranges, Mandarines — Losses over time
- Iraq
- South Africa
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 58 1000 t against 55 1000 t in South Africa, a difference of 3 1000 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Iraq ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 20th of 127 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.5 1000 t | 47 1000 t | 8.5 1000 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 51.5 1000 t | 51.25 1000 t | 0.25 1000 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges, mandarines — losses, Iraq or South Africa?
- Iraq, at 58 1000 t against 55 1000 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in oranges, mandarines — losses between Iraq and South Africa?
- 3 1000 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and South Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and South Africa rank globally for oranges, mandarines — losses?
- Iraq ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 20th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oranges, Mandarines — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.