Pakistan vs Suriname: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Pakistan
0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
74th
Suriname rank
72nd

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Suriname
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 74th and Suriname ranks 72nd of 102 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.1851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.4002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Pakistan or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Pakistan and Suriname?
0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Suriname?
38 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Suriname rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Pakistan ranks 74th and Suriname ranks 72nd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Suriname: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/suriname/">Pakistan vs Suriname: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.