Japan vs Mozambique: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Japan
0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
76th
Mozambique rank
73rd

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Japan
  • Mozambique
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 76th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.3007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2926 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.3061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2973 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.1387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Japan or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Japan and Mozambique?
0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Mozambique rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Japan ranks 76th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Mozambique: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/japan/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/japan/mozambique/">Japan vs Mozambique: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.