Egypt vs El Salvador: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Egypt
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
11th
El Salvador rank
9th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Egypt ranks 11th and El Salvador ranks 9th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.2538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5805 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.3877 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.5105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.6345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.9619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Egypt or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Egypt and El Salvador?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and El Salvador rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Egypt ranks 11th and El Salvador ranks 9th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs El Salvador: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/el-salvador/">Egypt vs El Salvador: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.