Costa Rica vs Portugal: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Costa Rica
1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Costa Rica rank
8th
Portugal rank
10th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Portugal
0123196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 8th and Portugal ranks 10th of 102 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Portugal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1558 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.4272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3979 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.5051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.791 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Costa Rica or Portugal?
Costa Rica, at 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Costa Rica and Portugal?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Costa Rica and Portugal rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Portugal ranks 10th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Portugal: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/portugal/">Costa Rica vs Portugal: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.