China vs Paraguay: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

China
0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
0.2272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
35th
Paraguay rank
38th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • China
  • Paraguay
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Paraguay ahead.

China ranks 35th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay
1970s 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1408 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay
1980s 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay
2000s 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 0.2654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1863 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0791 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.2675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0637 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Paraguay?
China, at 0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Paraguay?
0.0422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Paraguay rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 35th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Paraguay: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/paraguay/">China vs Paraguay: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.