China vs Nicaragua: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

China
0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
35th
Nicaragua rank
34th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • China
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

China ranks 35th and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 102 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1596 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.2654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2838 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.2675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Nicaragua?
0.0374 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Nicaragua rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 35th and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Nicaragua: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/nicaragua/">China vs Nicaragua: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.