Chile vs Sri Lanka: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Chile
0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
63rd
Sri Lanka rank
64th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Chile ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0577 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Sri Lanka?
Chile, at 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Sri Lanka?
0.0189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.