Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Chile
0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
63rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
61st

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 63rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st of 102 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0411 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0577 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
40 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 63rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 61st of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/guinea-bissau/">Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.