Botswana vs Zambia: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Botswana
0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
93rd
Zambia rank
95th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Botswana
  • Zambia
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Botswana ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 95th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Botswana or Zambia?
Botswana, at 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Botswana and Zambia?
0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zambia rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Botswana ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 95th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zambia: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/">Botswana vs Zambia: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.