Belize vs Zimbabwe: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Belize
0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Belize
  • Zimbabwe
01234196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 102 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
1970s 0.4636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
1980s 0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
1990s 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
2000s 2.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 0.7658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Belize or Zimbabwe?
Belize, at 0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Belize and Zimbabwe?
0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Zimbabwe rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Belize ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Zimbabwe: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/">Belize vs Zimbabwe: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.