Bangladesh vs Cuba: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Bangladesh
0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
85th
Cuba rank
88th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cuba
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.6 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 88th of 102 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bangladesh or Cuba?
Bangladesh, at 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bangladesh and Cuba?
0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Cuba rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bangladesh ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 88th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cuba: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cuba/">Bangladesh vs Cuba: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.