Algeria vs Zimbabwe: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Algeria
0.1795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Algeria
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 0.1795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Algeria's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
1970s 0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
1980s 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0338 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
2020s 0.1647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Algeria or Zimbabwe?
Algeria, at 0.1795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Algeria and Zimbabwe?
0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Zimbabwe rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Algeria ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Zimbabwe: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/algeria/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/algeria/zimbabwe/">Algeria vs Zimbabwe: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.