Panama vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … annual

Panama
0.5999 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
0.9409 % change on previous year
in 2024
Panama rank
45th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
43rd

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … annual over time

  • Panama
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-50-250255075196219932024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.9409 % change on previous year against 0.5999 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0.341 % change on previous year.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.6 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Panama ranks 45th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 131 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6909 % change on previous year 38.81 % change on previous year 39.5 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 6.57 % change on previous year 27.57 % change on previous year 21.01 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -1.35 % change on previous year 7.1 % change on previous year 8.45 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.049 % change on previous year 2.42 % change on previous year 2.37 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Panama or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.9409 % change on previous year against 0.5999 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2024.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Panama and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.341 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and United Republic of Tanzania?
28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do Panama and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Panama ranks 45th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 131 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/panama/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/panama/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Panama vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,769 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.