Malta vs New Zealand: Oranges — Area harvested, per capita
Malta
0.0001 ha per person
in 2017
New Zealand
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Malta rank
73rd
New Zealand rank
75th
Oranges — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was New Zealand ahead.
Malta ranks 73rd and New Zealand ranks 75th of 120 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges — area harvested, per capita, Malta or New Zealand?
- Malta, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in New Zealand as of 2017.
- What is the difference in oranges — area harvested, per capita between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0 ha per person, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for oranges — area harvested, per capita?
- Malta ranks 73rd and New Zealand ranks 75th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oranges — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.