Ethiopia vs Zambia: Oranges — Area harvested, per capita
Ethiopia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Zambia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
86th
Zambia rank
87th
Oranges — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Ethiopia
- Zambia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zambia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 87th of 120 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges — area harvested, per capita, Ethiopia or Zambia?
- Ethiopia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oranges — area harvested, per capita between Ethiopia and Zambia?
- 0 ha per person, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Zambia rank globally for oranges — area harvested, per capita?
- Ethiopia ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 87th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oranges — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.