Egypt vs Montenegro: Oranges — Area harvested, per capita
Egypt
0.0015 ha per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.0016 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
22nd
Montenegro rank
21st
Oranges — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.0016 ha per person against 0.0015 ha per person in Egypt, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Egypt ranks 22nd and Montenegro ranks 21st of 120 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.0012 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0014 ha per person | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges — area harvested, per capita, Egypt or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.0016 ha per person against 0.0015 ha per person in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oranges — area harvested, per capita between Egypt and Montenegro?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Montenegro rank globally for oranges — area harvested, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 22nd and Montenegro ranks 21st of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oranges — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.